I record with PT now and I already have ableton, so I use ableton for some stuff like MIDI, which I use as a tool in the music creation process. My vocal takes were good, but both my friends who went to music school and producers convinced me to get PT because it’s better for live recording.Īccording to my producers, Ableton is better for EDM types of music and I agree. They were infinitely better on Pro Tools. I personally do rock music, and the stock plugins on Ableton sucked HARD for instruments. The answer is it really depends ok what sort of music you are working on. (Source: working on my EP with some producers who’ve worked with both big and smaller artists) Hey! I’m not an expert on DAWs but hopefully, this will help. Idk if it's changed by now or not but at one point Reaper was functionally free because the trial version is identical to the licensed one and despite the alleged 60 day limit, it would just keep working forever with nothing more than a short nag screen on launch. I really prefer it over Pro Tools, as it is a considerable amount more DAW per dollar. Highly recommend taking it for a test drive some time. By default it's pretty clunky and ugly so you need to spend some time with it to get it set up for your own workflow and needs. It can actually do quite a bit more than Pro Tools can out of the box, the tradeoff being that Reaper has a noticeably steeper learning curve. It is extremely customizable, you can turn the interface into pretty much anything. It's similar in terms of accessibility (as in, it's not a casual consumer oriented DAW like GarageBand or the like), functionally though it's fairly different from Pro Tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |